Israel Versus The World - israelvworld.com

FBI Testified At 9/11 Commission
Hearing That U.S. Support of Israel
Primary Motivation of 9/11 Hijackers

Israeli Spies Part One

Israeli Spies Part Two

SuperMorris

Under Construction

What bin Laden really said to the American people

Under Construction

Under Construction ZONE

P a g e - 2

"The War On Terror" Propaganda

It's a nasty xenophobic, narcissistic little ditty, and it goes like this:

(Dubya voice) "On September 11th, 2001 Islamic extremists attacked America because they hate freedom and democracy, hot dogs, apple pies and Chevrolets. There's no negotiating with Islamic terrorists, because their skewed view of religion tells them to "kill us all." There's nothing you can do except, "hunt'em down and kill'em all." Do you want to fight them over there, or fight them over here in our own backyards? Listen up son, you're just going to have to realize there are good Muslims and bad Muslims, and the bad Muslims use and distort Islam in an unorthodox deadly way to kill innocent Americans. So who do you want to win the War On Terror? America or al Qaeda?"

This most evil of deadly Zionist propaganda pack of lies festers in the hearts, minds, wallets and soul of the American taxpayer. It's designed to instill permanent cascading fear in the lives of all Americans who own a pair of ears. It's designed to instill the kind of fear which causes the weak to sit by and watch their rights, privileges and immunities literally go up in smoke - the smoke and fire of U.S. bombs, tanks, bazookas, missiles, armored personnel carriers, Apache helicopters on the face and soul of Islamic peoples.

In order to believe in the War On Terror propaganda, it is necessary and essential for the Zionist media victim to ALSO BELIEVE the following:

There's no negotiating with Islamic terrorists;
There's no such thing as an Islamic terrorist seeking peace;
If you try to negotiate with Islamic terrorists, then you are a terrorist coddler and a liberal;
Either Islam itself is evil, or some believers' interpretations of Islam is evil; everybody knows Islamic terrorists have no legitimate complaint - they're just crazy Muslims who are so jealous of our freedom and hate our democracy so much, they're willing to kill you and me and themselves in the process; so there's only one way to handle these Islamic extremists: "hunt'em down and kill'em all!"

The Zionist media powers that be do NOT want you or anyone else even DISCUSSING ANYTHING BEYOND THAT when it comes to conversating about the "War On Terror." No, the Zionist powers that be insist Islamic terrorists have no legitimate complaint(s) against the U.S. and Israel, and the U.S. and Israel are as innocent as "Little Miss Red Riding Hood."

President Obama is still executing the unconstitutional, immoral and criminal "Bush Doctrine" of pre-emptive strikes against Islamic peoples. This is President Obama's biggest shame: the bloody, murderous legacy of the Bush-Cheney cabal lives on inside the Obama administration. The day after Obama took office Obama (re)-authorized the Predator drone bombing of Pakistanis, resulting in the deaths of over 1,000 Pakistani civilians to-date.

Pursuant to your logic and the precepts of the War On Terror, why aren't you bombing Saudi Arabia? Since 17 of the 19 9/11 hijackers were from Saudi Arabia. Two words: George Bush. Three words: Bubba and Daddy.

Dear President Obama: When are you going to STOP BOMBING brown folks you don't like???? When are you going to STOP the indiscriminate, pilotless, drone bombing of Pakistanis, resulting in the deaths of hundreds of civilians????? Are the "terrorists" you're killing in Pakistan and Afghanistan so adept and comprise such a strategic threat to the United States of America sitting on the Northern Continent, that you're willing to kill innocent civilian Pakistani men, women and children in the process of killing your "high-value targets?" Are you kidding me? What are you afraid of? A group of flat-footed, pissed-off Pakistanis and Afghans in robes suddenly and magically introducing a strategic threat to the mainland USA? Are you out of your ever-loving mind? OF COURSE NOT! Surely you're not so incompetent that you believe another group of rag-tag punks with boxcutters can pull off another 9/11? Are you kidding? You would have to execute (another) stand-down order to allow another 9/11 to happen, and I say that's highly unlikely these days. In other words, America is armed to the teeth, but you're so scared of Abdullah Q. Boxcutter that you're willing to sacrifice Islamic men, women and children? To "protect America?" Imagine a reality TV show, called, "The Sacrifice." A TV show where the American people could text in their vote: Is it worth it to sacrifice these 7 Pakistani men, women and children to "protect America," or do we vote for life for these seven human beings instead? Americans could face tough questions like, "Do you feel safer when President Obama kills a few "terrorists" with pilotless drones while sacrificing hundreds of innocent men, women and children?

James, I reviewed the text of the current bill and it seems intentionally vague in re: to the issue and definition of:

".....who is suspected of engaging in hostilities against the United States......"

and, "......purposely and materially supporting such hostilities......"

I take the position that I am a law-abiding U.S. citizen taxpayer who complains about my tax dollars being spent by my government in an illegal manner, and I am going to continue to complain about my tax dollars being spent in the illegal manner my own government is spending my tax dollars. It is categorically illegal for my government to provide U.S. weapons bought and paid for with U.S. tax dollars to nations who utilize our U.S. weapons in an offensive manner/capacity. Israel has been using our American-made and provided weapons in an offensive manner and capacity for decades now. This is a U.S. government FACT!

As you know James, our own U.S. State Dept. has already sanctioned Israel several times for using our American-made and provided weapons in an offensive manner/capacity, in violation of our U.S. Arms Control Export Act. I contend our U.S. government has a duty to follow our own laws; and as such, our government should NOT be providing the Israeli government with American-made weapons the IDF has been using for decades in an offensive manner. Islamic terrorists should have sued the U.S. government instead of physically attacking the U.S. government, since the Movants have sufficient basis in law and fact to survive summary judgment in U.S. District Court. The legal theory would not be UNLIKE an auto accident or simple negligence case:

1. Duty owed;

2. Violation of that duty owed;

3. Substantial injury;

4. As a direct and proximate cause of Defendant's violation of duty owed, Plaintiff was injured.

Verdict for the Plaintiff.

Islamic terrorists could have bellied up to the bar as just another special interest in the Beltway. The 9/11 hijackers should have hired a Houston law firm and a Los Angeles publicist instead of hijacking airplanes - they'd have a spot in Congress and the media right about now.

Further, my opposition to Israeli government policy is based on the past conduct of the Israeli government, certainly not anything to do with Judaism, per se. To oppose Judaism would be anti-semitic; to oppose Israeli government policy and conduct is pro-human rights - for Israelis and Palestinians. When an Israeli soldier stands on Palestinian land and fires his American-made weapon into a Palestinian's body, that is not "defending Israel." No, that's an uber-violation of the unfortunate Palestinian's individual human rights, not to mention a violation of international law and peace agreements. The "Defending Israel" concept is invalid, misleading and bogus; Why? Because the concept of "Defending Israel" excludes the one-state solution. If all Israelis and Palestinians lived under one state with equal human rights, then there would be no such thing as "Defending Israel" because there would no more, "Israel" as the ethnically-cleansed apartheid state Israel currently exists as.

Unfortunately, Israeli government officials oppose the One-State Solution, since such a state would require Israelis to treat Palestinians as equals re: human rights and citizenry. No, instead Israeli officials prefer and fight for a racially-pure state of Israel, engaging in institutional ethnic-cleansing to maintain a racially-pure Israel. How in the hell can any decent American support such a gang of racists? Moreover, why should our precious American tax dollars fund such Israeli hate-filled racist government policies?

Don't you know that Lieberman and the other Zionists here in our government wish they could pass a law prohibiting Americans from blaming the U.S. government for anything, much less blaming U.S. government policy and unconstitutional military operations for acts of terrorism directed against America.?

As you know James, the reality and truth is, U.S. support, arming and funding of Israel is why Islamic terrorists hate us and attack us. It doesn't have a damn thing to do with terrorists hating our hot dogs, apple pies, Chevrolets and freedom - no, it is the fact our Congress has been funding and arming Israel's 45-year long illegal Israeli military occupation of the Palestinian territories that motivates the Islamic boy into acting as "Islamic terrorist."

It makes an American proud of our First Amendment Free Speech Rights, because if we didn't have the right to free speech on this subject, we would surely be jailed for what the government deems, "anti-government activity." In our opinion(s), our conduct is pro-government activity because we seek to cure our government of the unlawful conduct of U.S. government officials and unconstitutional policies of our U.S. government.

We don't hate our form of government! We love our form of government! It's the player's we hate - not the game.

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the ‘Enemy Belligerent Interrogation, Detention, and Prosecution Act of 2010’.

SEC. 2. PLACEMENT OF SUSPECTED UNPRIVILEGED ENEMY BELLIGERENTS IN MILITARY CUSTODY.

(a) Military Custody Requirement- Whenever within the United States, its territories, and possessions, or outside the territorial limits of the United States, an individual is captured or otherwise comes into the custody or under the effective control of the United States who is suspected of engaging in hostilities against the United States or its coalition partners through an act of terrorism, or by other means in violation of the laws of war, or of purposely and materially supporting such hostilities, and who may be an unprivileged enemy belligerent, the individual shall be placed in military custody for purposes of initial interrogation and determination of status in accordance with the provisions of this Act.

British Survivor of Gaza Flotilla Raid: "Israelis Igno

End of Zionism = PEACE!red SOS Calls."